Charlottesville Joint Correct Civil Trial Tuesday: The jury asks whether damages to the plaintiff can be separated from the conspiracy claim

Read Time:4 Minute, 48 Second

The federal jury asked whether it was possible to separate the punitive amounts awarded to individual plaintiffs in claim three. The jury did not mention one or two claims.

The three claims in the judgment are related to the Virginia Civil Conspiracy Law. The form requires jurors to list the amount of punitive damages (if any) that should be awarded to each defendant, rather than the amount that should be awarded to a particular plaintiff.

U.S. District Judge Norman Moon said in response to the jury that they could not separate the punitive amounts awarded to individual plaintiffs in the three claims, and only those plaintiffs who received compensatory damages could receive punitive damages.

This issue was raised on the third day of deliberation, and a day later the jury asked the judge to reach a consensus on the six charges.

This is the fifth question raised by the jury since its deliberations last Friday.

On Monday, the 12-member panel asked Moon if they could not agree on the first three allegations, whether they need to agree on each of the last three allegations.

Two of the crimes-five and six-were only related to the behavior of James Alex Fields Jr., who drove a car into the protest crowd, killing one person and injuring dozens of others. The other involves racial, religious or ethnic harassment or violence.

Without the jury present, the judge said: “I don’t know why there is any misunderstanding. I think I will tell them that they must continue to work hard to reach a consensus on all six charges.”

The jury will decide in each charge whether each defendant should be liable for damages. In a civil trial, the plaintiff’s lawyer must prove that the defendant has the responsibility of “advantageous evidence,” Moon told the jurors that this means that a 50.1% or greater probability is true.

Plans to demolish the statue sparked a rally

The United Right Rally was held from August 11 to 12, 2017 to oppose the plan to dismantle the statue of Confederate General Robert E. Lee. As the violence unfolded, when Fields, who opposed the removal of the statue, drove into a group of counter-protesters, it reached a tipping point and killed the 32-year-old Heather Haye.

Twelve people and five white supremacist and nationalist organizations were listed as defendants in the civil lawsuit.

The joint right-wing trial exposed the gap between who planned the battle for white nationalism and who fought it

Plaintiffs, including urban residents and counter-protesters injured in the conflict, are seeking compensation and statutory compensation for the physical and psychological injuries they suffered as a result of the violence in the assembly. They also argued that the organizers of the rally were involved in conspiracies and planned violent activities to trigger racial and religious wars.

The defense lawyer and two well-known defendants who represented themselves argued that none of the plaintiffs could prove that the defendant organized racial violence.

The closing debate ended on Thursday. The jurors received the 77-page final instruction and verdict form on Friday morning and began their deliberations.
Review here what led to the

According to the instructions of the jurors, in order for the main conspiracy lawsuit to succeed, the plaintiff must prove that there was a conspiracy involving two or more people.

In addition, the jury’s instructions stated that the plaintiff must prove that the conspiracy was partly motivated by “hostility” towards blacks or Jews, or because the plaintiff supported these communities and that this conspiracy was designed to deprive them of their right to be protected from racial violence.

Finally, according to the instructions, the plaintiff must prove that at least one person in the conspiracy “taken an open act” while continuing racial violence and that the plaintiff was harmed by the act.

One of the lawyers representing the plaintiff, Roberta Kaplan, stated that the plaintiff who was hit by the Fields car requested US$7 million to US$10 million, while the other plaintiffs demanded US$3 million to US$5 million.

The plaintiff’s lawyer said that the defendant is seeking a fight

Convergence of 4 cases to test American justice

Under the protection of the non-profit organization Integrity First for America, a strong team of lawyers is representing the plaintiffs in their civil cases.

In the closing statement, the lawyer representing the plaintiff told the jury that the defendant was prepared for the “Battle of Charlottesville”, and the messages sent between them and their behavior after the violence proved their conspiracy.

Lawyers displayed texts and messages on an online platform called Discord and even on Facebook Messenger to show that the organizers not only want the anti-protesters they call antifa or communists to appear, but they also expect a quarrel. Lawyers said that the organizers wanted this battle very much, and they even tried to delay the counter-demonstrators, hoping they would hit the first punch.

The defense says there is no evidence of the conspiracy

The defense lawyer and two well-known defendants who represented themselves countered that none of the plaintiffs proved that the defendants organized racial violence.

“The plaintiff must prove the agreement. The agreement is not a virus that can be spread at the assembly,” said Brian Jones, a lawyer representing the three defendants.

The defendants argued throughout the trial that not only did they not know each other, but they were just taking security measures to prevent them from being attacked by Antifa. The defendants also claimed that their hate speech was nothing more than a dirty joke that should not be taken seriously.

CNN’s Mark Morales reports in Charlottesville, and Steve Almasy reports and writes in Atlanta. Aya Elamroussi and Amir Vera of CNN contributed to this report.

Source link
You have to be inform about what is happening in USA go to united states news to see more.

0 %
0 %
0 %
0 %
0 %
0 %
We use cookies to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. View more
Cookies settings
Privacy & Cookie policy
Privacy & Cookies policy
Cookie name Active

Who we are

Suggested text: Our website address is:


Suggested text: When visitors leave comments on the site we collect the data shown in the comments form, and also the visitor’s IP address and browser user agent string to help spam detection. An anonymized string created from your email address (also called a hash) may be provided to the Gravatar service to see if you are using it. The Gravatar service privacy policy is available here: After approval of your comment, your profile picture is visible to the public in the context of your comment.


Suggested text: If you upload images to the website, you should avoid uploading images with embedded location data (EXIF GPS) included. Visitors to the website can download and extract any location data from images on the website.


Suggested text: If you leave a comment on our site you may opt-in to saving your name, email address and website in cookies. These are for your convenience so that you do not have to fill in your details again when you leave another comment. These cookies will last for one year. If you visit our login page, we will set a temporary cookie to determine if your browser accepts cookies. This cookie contains no personal data and is discarded when you close your browser. When you log in, we will also set up several cookies to save your login information and your screen display choices. Login cookies last for two days, and screen options cookies last for a year. If you select "Remember Me", your login will persist for two weeks. If you log out of your account, the login cookies will be removed. If you edit or publish an article, an additional cookie will be saved in your browser. This cookie includes no personal data and simply indicates the post ID of the article you just edited. It expires after 1 day.

Embedded content from other websites

Suggested text: Articles on this site may include embedded content (e.g. videos, images, articles, etc.). Embedded content from other websites behaves in the exact same way as if the visitor has visited the other website. These websites may collect data about you, use cookies, embed additional third-party tracking, and monitor your interaction with that embedded content, including tracking your interaction with the embedded content if you have an account and are logged in to that website.

Who we share your data with

Suggested text: If you request a password reset, your IP address will be included in the reset email.

How long we retain your data

Suggested text: If you leave a comment, the comment and its metadata are retained indefinitely. This is so we can recognize and approve any follow-up comments automatically instead of holding them in a moderation queue. For users that register on our website (if any), we also store the personal information they provide in their user profile. All users can see, edit, or delete their personal information at any time (except they cannot change their username). Website administrators can also see and edit that information.

What rights you have over your data

Suggested text: If you have an account on this site, or have left comments, you can request to receive an exported file of the personal data we hold about you, including any data you have provided to us. You can also request that we erase any personal data we hold about you. This does not include any data we are obliged to keep for administrative, legal, or security purposes.

Where we send your data

Suggested text: Visitor comments may be checked through an automated spam detection service.
Save settings
Cookies settings